And? It's a new system now, but even so, many companies have spent years on the low before booming up.
How does the marketcap of an early product determine its future? Thats like saying all corporate entities with high end marketcaps must have started that way. IQ has a marketcap! All those nasty manipulators trading valueless tokens for a site that has SEO but doesn't. Why would it take 2 or more decades for Ev to surpass wiki when Ev can just copy? Actually, what metric are you using for something to surpass? 'Quality posts'? Popularity? Wait, Wiki is a nonprofit, right? And does not surpassing wiki really a good indicator of Ev's failure?Īlso, why would they lose funding? Will there no longer be a market around IQ? Are we very sure?
They're not even coherent let alone consistent from what can be interpreted.ģ) Wikipedia is centralized all the same so whats the difference here? I haven't checked into Ev's curation system but the question still stands.Ĥ) Wikipedia was founded in 2001. Lol.Īre we still on just google based SEO, so there's Google SEO afterall? Lol. So according to you, those buying must be manipulators. Hmm and you said without SEO, manipulators won't even care. I feel like most people just want to invest and make money, not go Dr. No one has demand for the coin except a certain group of manipulators? In other words, everyone who bought it is a manipulator? I dunno man. Sure, DDG isn't as popular as Google but does a smaller pipeline of traffic fit into 'failure'? I wonder how the other search engines would process the Ev site.Īlso, will Google remain the top contender especially with Dapps coming out which might replace its popularity spot? I can understand your assumption to its longterm position but it's only an assumption.Ģ) Sure it has intrinsic value. I just want to know what the hell fail means lol.ġ) You've used Google as a base reference but why not other search engines? Duckduckgo for example doesn't block Ev. In other words, the system as it is with all your reasons has yet to fail? So fail means unattainable goals/final function of some sort? If so, please clarify these goals. Just some ideas about your arguments, Puma.įirstly, you had given reasons for why Ev will 'fail' sometime in the future. I wonder what that would do to the price 🤔? If they want to edit, they will have to buy and stake tokens. Once we merge the domain (which has all the SEO) with the iqnetwork.io blockchain site, that is ~45k new people a day, most of them not into crypto, being exposed to crypto and EOS ("Powered by EOS" is on the footer of the page). Most are vaporware projects and exit scams. Other than Steemit (and the top 10 coins) what other crypto projects have this level of traffic? That's right, very few. Those pages are meant as supplements and "blue links" for unique non-imported pages.Īs far as token economics and whale voting go, we explain each of those in our white paper, which you probably did not bother reading. The DAC will of course have ruling power to remove things from high staked content, for instance false advertisement.Īre you kidding me? The site has 1 - 2M uniques a month and if you were technically inclined, you would notice that we meta robots noindexed the Wikipedia imported pages per Google guidelines as they are indeed duplicate content. People who really care are incentivized to buy tokens to make sure it's very hard for malicious entities to modify. One example I can think of is editing commercial related content, for instance description of a company. Also I imagine the token can be monetized. If this structure is superior, maybe it will win over content creators in Wikipedia.Īs to intrinsic value of IQ token, for one it can mean reputation, which would be valuable if one day Everipedia is popular. Decisions can be made collectively by voting, and accountability will be clear. Editing decisions can be made transparent on block chain. One possible role block chain can help in this space is to allow building a DAC in editor community. So far what Everipedia has done isn't enough to disrupt Wikipedia. New technology has to be a magnitude better to convince the mass to switch from old technology.
0 kommentar(er)
